In light of the recent media political brouhaha here in
America, I repeat a blog posted on The Rubicon some time ago:
Merriam Webster Online Dictionary defines the word, “ism,”
in two parts:
1 : a distinctive doctrine, cause, or
theory
2 : an oppressive and especially
discriminatory attitude or belief isms — Jocelyn
Elders>
Peter Viereck cites the following example: “Formalism,
by being an ‘ism,’ kills form by hugging it to death.” Another word for
“hug” in this context is “smother.” Dogma is defined as “a set of beliefs.”
Following this line of thinking: Dogmatism,
by being an ‘ism,’ kills belief by smothering it to death.
“…ism” on the tail end of anything frightens me to death, be
it conservatism, liberalism, capitalism, socialism, dogmatism, pragmatism,
atheism, spiritualism, whatever, it always leads to schism. Pinpoint trouble
spots in the world today and where there is schism you will generally find a
prevailing, trailing “ism.”
Even as I write, the self-anointed voice of conservatism in
this country, Rush Limbaugh, is speaking to the Conservative Political Action
Committee, carried live nationally, commercial-free on Fox and CNN. In his
speech, he denounces the supposed liberalism of the newly elected President,
the one whom “he hopes will fail,” saying, “President Obama: Your agenda is not
new, its not change, and its not hope… [Conservatism] is what it
is and has been forever," he said. "It is not something you can bend
or shape."
Wow! I rest my case, there it is right here in
America: An unbending, oppressive, discriminatory “ism” creating schism. One
savvy news reporter wrote, “The conservative talker with the
self-professed ‘talent on loan from God’ spoke incessantly in the first
person…one clear message emerged from the speech: ‘Le mouvement conservative, c'est moi.’"
“On loan from God.” Wait a minute, not my God! I’ve searched the New Testament through, and the “isms” are conspicuously missing from Christ’s Gospel. There is nothing oppressive or discriminating about it. Limbaugh professes to speak for the religious right, but I can say emphatically that his God is not my God! And I can also say just as forcefully that I love him (Limbaugh), unconditionally, no matter his trailing “isms.” Is there such a word as compassionism?
“On loan from God.” Wait a minute, not my God! I’ve searched the New Testament through, and the “isms” are conspicuously missing from Christ’s Gospel. There is nothing oppressive or discriminating about it. Limbaugh professes to speak for the religious right, but I can say emphatically that his God is not my God! And I can also say just as forcefully that I love him (Limbaugh), unconditionally, no matter his trailing “isms.” Is there such a word as compassionism?
Salvationists reading this are already one
step ahead of me: “Salvationism, by being an ‘ism,’ kills salvation by
hugging it to death.” The question begs itself, “Is The Salvation
Army ever ‘discriminatory or oppressive in its attitudes or beliefs?’” Is an
ever-growing tendency toward exclusiveness tantamount to hugging ourselves to
death? Examples abound and I will not bore you with them once again; better you
fill in the blanks anyway.
I will echo Jocelyn Elders sage advice however: “We
all have got to come to grips with our isms.”
JN


